I got back from Haiti on June 4. Still working on how to write up my thoughts and experiences on that. But, before I get to that, I want to post about how the US has messed with not only the Haitian economy, but helped mess up our own.

On June 5, the day after I got back, I read a post called Wikileaks: U.S. Intervened To Keep Haiti Slave Wages Low On Behalf Of Hanes, Levi Strauss at Crooks and Liars. The Nation’s article that spawned the post is called Let Them Live on $3 a Day.

Here’s the gist: Factory owners in Haiti refused to raise the pay for their workers to $5 a day. The US Agency for International Development and the US Embassy backed the owners.

Levi Straus “vehemently denies” this, stating that, at $3 a day, their workers make more than 80% of their fellow Haitians. Which is a wonderful bit of marketing: They’re not quite as poor as everyone else in the poorest country in the western hemisphere.

How far does $3 a day go in Haiti? The Nation’s article has this informative bit:

According to a 2008 Worker Rights Consortium study, a family of one working member and two dependents needed at least 550 Haitian gourdes, or $12.50, per day to meet normal living expenses.

In one town where we served in Haiti, we were told the average household size was 9 people. So, even with the $2/day raise, it still wouldn’t be a living wage.

How does this screw the US economy over? Simple: American workers can’t compete with $3/day. So, Haitians don’t benefit, and Americans don’t either. Who does? Crooks and Liars points out “Hanesbrands CEO Richard Noll, on the other hand, got a nice cushy $10 million compensation package last year.”

Oct 092009

I’ll start with a quote from an article I read:

Minnesota Senator Al Franken–over the objection of fully 30 Republicans–authored and passed legislation Wednesday restricting military contractors from bidding “if they restrict their employees from taking workplace sexual assault, battery and discrimination cases to court.” Yes, they had to pass a law for that.

The whole situation that prompted this legislation sickens me, and good on Franken for working to correct it.

What I’d like to comment on is this paragraph:

The Senate voted for the amendment 68-30. The 30 Senators that think Halliburton subsidiary KBR ought to be allowed to deny its female employees access to the legal system when they are raped by its male employees are, naturally, all Republican and include: Jones’ Senator John Cornyn; the philandering Christian John Ensign; noted prostitution enthusiast David Vitter; gynecologist and anti-abortion advocate Tom Coburn; personhood-for-fetuses advocate Sam Brownback; women’s “health” advocate John McCain; and Minority Leader Mitch McConnell.

I’m definitely in the pro-life camp. I do think it’s a fair question, however, to ask why someone who wouldn’t want a raped woman to abort a baby why they also wouldn’t want the woman to be able to pursue justice for being raped in the first place. And I don’t even want to get started on the damage done when someone can be labeled a “philandering Christian.”

Nonsense like this is why I no longer support either political party. You can see how your senators voted here. I intend to ask Georgia’s senators why they voted against this amendment.

© 2011 Bryan L. Fordham Suffusion theme by Sayontan Sinha